Find What He Said That His Own File Contradicts.
A contradiction is never on one page. The claimant denies a prior back injury in his deposition; the answer sits in a chiropractic note from three years earlier, produced as an exhibit in a different file. Reading each document carefully will not find it, because the finding only exists when the two are held against each other. Cross Matter™ compares the sworn account against every record, imaging study, bill and surveillance file in the matter and hands you the pair — both quotes, both addresses, ready to put in front of someone.
Sworn
“No. Never. My back was fine before March 12th.”
Sandoval depo · 4:1Record
“Recurrence. Reports this is a long-standing problem, several years.”
Wayzata chiro · p.2- The prior injury he denied, with the treatment records that contradict it
- The lifting restriction, against what surveillance recorded him doing
- The treating physician’s opinion, against the independent examination and the imaging
You cannot read your way to it
The file is thousands of pages across a dozen providers, and the contradiction lives between two of them. Careful reading finds what is in a document; it cannot find what is inconsistent between one document and another produced two years apart by a different office. That is not an attention problem, it is a combinatorial one, and it is the reason these get missed by people who are doing their job properly.
Ready before the deposition, not after it
Run it on what you already have and the confrontations are written before you sit down: the question, the answer you expect, and the exhibit to hand him when it does not come. Run it again when the transcript arrives and you find out what actually held. Either way it is a list of things you can do, not a report to read.
Quoted both ways, addressed both ways
Every finding shows the sworn quote and the record quote side by side, each with the page:line it came from, and clicking either opens that page. What you put in front of a mediator is something you have read yourself, in the source, not a summary you are hoping is right.
Frequently asked questions
- What does it compare?
- Sworn testimony, recorded statements, texts and emails on one side; medical records, imaging, diagnostics, bills and surveillance on the other. The comparison runs across the whole matter rather than document by document, because a contradiction only exists between two sources.
- Can I scope it to one witness?
- Yes. Choose the sources to examine and it reads only those, but it still checks them against the whole record, because a statement needs a counterparty to be contradicted by.
- Does it only find contradictions?
- It finds them and shows the ones that go the other way too — where the record backs a point you intend to make, with the corroborating sources listed under it. Both are worth knowing before you commit to an argument.
- Why not use the free summary that came with my transcript?
- Your reporting agency gives you an AI summary to keep you ordering depositions from them. It works on their transcript, and it forgets everything the moment the deposition is over. It has never seen the medical file, so it cannot tell you what the record says the witness is wrong about — which is the only thing on this page.
- How do I verify a finding?
- Every quote is a link to the page it came from, addressed to page:line for testimony and to the page for a record. Nothing is asserted without an address you can open.
- Is the record protected?
- Yes. Cross Matter operates under a HIPAA business associate agreement, your matters are never used to train a model, and records are encrypted in transit and at rest.